Note: You are currently viewing documentation for Moodle 2.0. Up-to-date documentation for the latest stable version is available here: Moodle research.

Talk:Moodle research: Difference between revisions

From MoodleDocs
(New page: ==Why this?== There is no single, quality source to gather research about Moodle (and LMS/VLE in general, with mentions of Moodle). A page one can point to when asked: 'What does the resea...)
 
(Removing all content from page)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Why this?==
 
There is no single, quality source to gather research about Moodle (and LMS/VLE in general, with mentions of Moodle). A page one can point to when asked: 'What does the research say about Moodle?'
==What to include?==
Links to pieces of quality academic research about design and use of Moodle and LMS/VLE in general. This includes papers, articles, reports, theses, case studies, videos and similar material. See How to include? section on the format.
==What NOT to include?==
Blog posts (unless highly relevant and contain quality references [>3 as a base] to this topic), tutorials, 'how to' videos, newspaper articles (if a study quoted, go to the original source instead)
==How to include & citation format?===
You will not lose any credit if you don't cite works with absolute precision to a particular style ;-) Whether you use [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parenthetical_referencing Harvard style] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APA_style APA style], simply mention the author(s), date, title, source of publication and a *link to publication* for others to access. Something like this will do just fine:
Smith, J (2011) Research review of use of Moodle in educational institutions. [https://docs.moodle.org/Moodle_research Moodle Magazine No.1]
==Should I annotate and explain more about the work(s) I list?==
Please do, but not on this page. ...

Latest revision as of 05:51, 18 March 2011