Talk:SPDC Portfolio: Difference between revisions
From MoodleDocs
(→Prep for Moodle 2.0: no revert, we need a new page name for old stuff) |
(→Prep for Moodle 2.0: I will follow my suggestions) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Chris, the third-party Portfolio module, and the Portfolio integration in Moodle 2.0 core are completely separate things. I think you should revert your changes to this page.--[[User:Tim Hunt|Tim Hunt]] 16:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | :Chris, the third-party Portfolio module, and the Portfolio integration in Moodle 2.0 core are completely separate things. I think you should revert your changes to this page.--[[User:Tim Hunt|Tim Hunt]] 16:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Thanks for comment. I think a new page rather than a revert is in order. Any suggestion for naming the contributed module Portfolio page? "Portfolio module" should be the starting page name for 2.0 Portfolio version. Maybe a [[Portfolio]] Disambiguation page for a year or so, and add a [[Portfolio 1.9]] for the contributed module page. "Old Portfolio module" as a page name is not very respectful :) --[[User:chris collman|chris collman]] 17:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | ::Thanks for comment. I think a new page rather than a revert is in order. Any suggestion for naming the contributed module Portfolio page? "Portfolio module" should be the starting page name for 2.0 Portfolio version. Maybe a [[Portfolio]] Disambiguation page for a year or so, and add a [[Portfolio 1.9]] for the contributed module page. "Old Portfolio module" as a page name is not very respectful :) --[[User:chris collman|chris collman]] 17:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::Hi Tim, I am just going to do it. I needed the info your provided to make an articulable decision. --[[User:chris collman|chris collman]] 17:40, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:40, 27 January 2010
Prep for Moodle 2.0
Portfolio will be part of Standard package in 2.0. I do not know how it relates to previous versions and what needs to happen to transition from Portfolio 1.9 to 2.0 . I noticed under Advanced features (a new 2.0 feature?) that "Portfolio" was a broken link, so came here. I broke the version out into subheadings but the big picture people may have a better idea. --Chris collman 15:42, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Chris, the third-party Portfolio module, and the Portfolio integration in Moodle 2.0 core are completely separate things. I think you should revert your changes to this page.--Tim Hunt 16:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for comment. I think a new page rather than a revert is in order. Any suggestion for naming the contributed module Portfolio page? "Portfolio module" should be the starting page name for 2.0 Portfolio version. Maybe a Portfolio Disambiguation page for a year or so, and add a Portfolio 1.9 for the contributed module page. "Old Portfolio module" as a page name is not very respectful :) --Chris collman 17:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Tim, I am just going to do it. I needed the info your provided to make an articulable decision. --Chris collman 17:40, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for comment. I think a new page rather than a revert is in order. Any suggestion for naming the contributed module Portfolio page? "Portfolio module" should be the starting page name for 2.0 Portfolio version. Maybe a Portfolio Disambiguation page for a year or so, and add a Portfolio 1.9 for the contributed module page. "Old Portfolio module" as a page name is not very respectful :) --Chris collman 17:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
