Talk:Web Hosts

"Host" Discussion

Chris, I understand why your wanted to add an explanation of host, but I don't think that's how the section should start. I have implemented a footnote for your explanation. If you feel strongly I don't have a problem moving it back to the main text, but I would prefer to see it as second or third paragraph

Marc Grober 13:49, 13 February 2009 (CST)

Ooo Filling in that table in the wiki is not very tempting! The google docs seems a lot more attractive way of doing it. (Though a more compact layout might be good there.) I was thinking of putting in what I know about SiteGround. Another field that might be of interest: I am way below all my quotas (Disk Space Usage 23883/768000) at SiteGround but they said my "inodes" were getting too high (Inodes Usage 125619/150000). I'm not sure what that means. I get the feeling that the Gigabyte are useless if they'll stop you for inodes. Jeff Forssell 07:12, 16 February 2009 (CST)

Added info on blue host, used * beside ssh as they will allow it but it is not standard and you have to fax them your ID--E. L. Cooper 01:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

I have uploaded Moodle to two free hosting sites recently, including HostHelpers and 000webhost with both sites running Moodle quite fine. I would like to propose a new field for your table, as some sort of measure of uptime for the hosts. For instance, while Moodle works fine on the HostHelpers site, they are having some issues with uptime across their whole server, affecting every site hosted on it. Also, in the table, is it possible to make the host names all clickable links? --Robert Frittmann 13:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC)