This is a test site. Any changes will be lost!

Development:XML database schema: Difference between revisions

From MoodleDocs
mNo edit summary
 
(48 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Work in progress}}
#redirect [[Development:XMLDB Documentation]]
The goal of these pages is to document, explain and follow the evolution of the integration between Moodle and other RDBS, using the [http://phplens.com/lens/adodb/docs-datadict.htm#xmlschema ADOdb XML Schema] (AXMLS), built over the [http://phplens.com/lens/adodb/docs-datadict.htm ADOdb Data Dictionary], that comes with the [http://adodb.sourceforge.net/ ADOdb] library, used by Moodle to perform all DB operations since the beginning.
 
__NOTOC__
 
==Preliminary tests==
 
This test involves the creation of one minimal DB structure (2-3 tables) testing all these features with the XML schema:
 
# Table creation.
# Field creation:
#* names (don't forget reserved words!).
#* types
#* length considerations
#* autonumeric (serial or sequence) fields.
#* default values
#* unsigned support
#* null/not null decission!
# PK creation and naming
# INDEX and UNIQUE INDEX creation an naming
# FK creation and naming?
 
==The roadmap==
 
 
==Todo list==
 
# We need to change all the  uses of the '''LIMIT offset, num''' clause to use the cross-db compatible '''SelectLimit()''' function. Two alternatives seem possible:
## Create a new set of get_records_limit() (and get_recordset_limit() ?) functions, allowing to specify the offset, num parameters.
## Modify the current get_records() (and get_recordset()) functions to allow two more optional parameters (offset, num)
# Analyse the impact of such SelectLimit() calls under SQL*Server, Oracle... because it's '''emulated''' by ADOdb on those DBs, because their lack of support for the LIMIT clause. As the offset parameter grows, ADOdb must iterate over more records to get the desired '''window''' and it could be a problem under long sets of records!
# What to do with all the previously created DB objects (indexes, unique indexes, sequences...) if their naming schema doesn't fit with the implemented by ADOdb. Drop/recreate everything? Leave it unmodified?
# Currently, both under MySQL and PostgreSQL, ADODB_FETCH_BOTH (default) is used so all the information is, practically, duplicated. In other side, SQL*Server, by default, uses ADODB_FETCH_NUM (although it can be changed to ADODB_FETCH_ASSOC). Proposal, after connection, change '''ALWAYS'' to ADODB_FETCH_ASSOC. It's supported by all the DB (while ADODB_FETCH_BOTH isn't!) and it will save us near 50% memory (and speed?) for record arrays! If there was some places using ADODB_FETCH_NUM structures inside Moodle (I really thing they aren't used) we must update them. '''UPDATED:''' it seems that the id field is lost in conversion to ADODB_FETCH_ASSOC so, perhaps it wouldn't be a good idea to force this mode! :-(
# Force ADODB_ASSOC_CASE to 0 (lowercase). Some DB could break this and until now, both mysql and postgresql are working fine with lowercased field names.
# Reserver words. What to do? One horrible example: "USER": http://www.petefreitag.com/tools/sql_reserved_words_checker/?word=user
## Try to quote them.
## Change them completely under Moodle.
# Need to pre-parse the XML database schema to add prefix to all tables/indexes/constraints before parsing and executing!
# Analise how upgrades are going to succeed. DML should be php, but DDL ?
 
==See also==
 
* [[XMLDB preliminary links]] - A collection of links about general info, searched and analysed at the initial stages of the project.
* [[XMLDB column types]] - Some links about column types inside every RDBMS and their characteristics.
* [[XMLDB reserved words]] - A collection of reserver words inside each RDBMS
 
[[Category:Developer]]

Latest revision as of 16:53, 28 February 2007