Note:

If you want to create a new page for developers, you should create it on the Moodle Developer Resource site.

Unit test API: Difference between revisions

From MoodleDocs
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
The purpose of Unit Tests is to evaluate the individual parts of a program (functions, and methods of classes) to make sure that each element individually does the right thing. Unit Tests can be one of the first steps in a quality control process for developing or tweaking Moodle code.  The next steps will involve other forms of testing to ensure that these different parts work together properly.  
The purpose of Unit Tests is to evaluate the individual parts of a program (functions, and methods of classes) to make sure that each element individually does the right thing. Unit Tests can be one of the first steps in a quality control process for developing or tweaking Moodle code.  The next steps will involve other forms of testing to ensure that these different parts work together properly.  


The unit testing framework is based on the [http://www.lastcraft.com/simple_test.php SimpleTest] framework. It was incorporated into Moodle by Nick Freear and Tim Hunt from [http://www.open.ac.uk/ The Open University].
The unit testing framework is based on the [http://www.simpletest.org/ SimpleTest] framework.
 


== Running the unit tests in Moodle ==
== Running the unit tests in Moodle ==
Line 12: Line 11:


# Log in with an admin account.  
# Log in with an admin account.  
# Go to the admin screen.
# Administration ► Development ► Unit tests (moodle >= 2.0, Administration ► Reports ► Unit tests Moodle <= 1.9)
# Click on the '''Reports''' link near the bottom of the page.
# Click on the '''Reports''' link near the bottom of the page.
# Click on the '''Run the unit tests''' link.
# Click the '''Run tests''' button and wait.
# Wait for the tests to run.
 
=== Options for running the tests ===
 
At the bottom of the tests page, there is form that lets you adjust the options used when running the tests.
 
==== Show passes as well as fails ====
 
Normally, only details of the tests that have failed are printed. Turning on this options shows details of all the passes too.
 
==== Show the search for test files ====
 
The tests to run are found automatically be searching the codebase for files whose names match '''test*.php''' in directories called '''simpletest'''. Turning on this option will print a list of the folders searched and the test files found. This is sometimes useful for debugging.
 
This option is particularly useful when one of your test files has a syntax error. When this happens, you sometimes just get a blank page with no error message. Turning on the show search option lets you see which test file it was that gave the error. If necessary, you can enable this option manually by adding "showsearch=1" to the end of the URL.
 
==== Run a thorough test (may be slow) ====
 
If you turn on this option, then as well as looking for files called '''test*.php''', the search also looks for files called '''slowtest*.php'''.
 
To be useful, the full test run should find most bugs, but not take too long to complete. So if you have very, very detailed tests of an area of the code, it may be better to select a subset for everday testing, and only use the more detailed tests when a bug is reported, or you are doing new development in that area of the code.
 
This option is most useful when combined with the next option.
 
==== Only run tests in ====
 
Normally, tests from all parts of the codebase are run. However, when you are just doing development of one part of the code, that is a waste of time. You can type the name of a folder (for example '''mod/quiz''') or a particular test file (for example '''lib/simpletest/testdatalib.php''') and then only those tests will be run.
 
[[Image:RunOnlyTheseTests.png|right]] Instead of typing a path into this box, there is an easier way. Whenever a pass or fail is displayed, the name of the test file is printed. Each section of the path name is a link to run only the tests in that folder or file.


This finds all the tests in Moodle and runs them. You can run a subset of the tests by entering a path (for example question/type) in the 'Only run tests in' box. Similarly, if a test fails, you get some links in the failure message to make it easy to re-run just those tests.


== Writing new tests ==
== Writing new tests ==


As an example, suppose we wanted to start writing tests for the functions in the file 'question/editlib.php'.
As an example, suppose we wanted to write some tests for the string_manager class in mod/quiz/editlib.php.


=== Where to put the tests ===
=== Where to put the tests ===


If you have read the first half of this page and were paying attention, you can probably work out that you should create a folder called '''question/simpletest''', and create a file in there called something like '''testeditlib.php'''.
The unit test report finds tests by looking for folders called 'test....php' inside folders called 'simpletest'.


The skeleton of this file should look like:
So, for our example, we want to create called something like '''mod/quiz/simpletest/testeditlib.php'''. The skeleton of this file should look like:


<code php>
<code php>
<?php
<?php
/**
/**
  * Unit tests for (some of) question/editlib.php.
  * Unit tests for (some of) mod/quiz/editlib.php.
  *
  *
* @copyright &copy; 2006 The Open University
* @author T.J.Hunt@open.ac.uk
  * @license http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html GNU Public License
  * @license http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html GNU Public License
  * @package question
  * @package question
  */
  */


/** */
if (!defined('MOODLE_INTERNAL')) {
require_once(dirname(__FILE__) . '/../../config.php');
    die('Direct access to this script is forbidden.'); //  It must be included from a Moodle page
}


global $CFG;
// Make sure the code being tested is accessible.
require_once($CFG->libdir . '/simpletestlib.php'); // Include the test libraries
require_once($CFG->dirroot . '/mod/quiz/editlib.php'); // Include the code to test
require_once($CFG->dirroot . '/question/editlib.php'); // Include the code to test


/** This class contains the test cases for the functions in editlib.php. */
/** This class contains the test cases for the functions in editlib.php. */
class question_editlib_test extends UnitTestCase {
class quiz_editlib_test extends UnitTestCase {
     function test_get_default_question_category() {
     function test_something() {
         // Do the test here/
         // Do the test here.
     }
     }
    // ... more test methods.
}
}
?>
?>
</code>
</code>


That is, you have a class called something_test, and in that class you have lots of methods called test_something. Normally, you have one test method for each function you want to test, and you may as well called the test method '''test_name_of_function_being_tested'''.
That is, you have a class called something_test, and in that class you have lots of methods called test_something. Normally, you have one test method for each particular thing you want to test, and you should try to name the function to describe what is being tested - without making the name too ridiculously long!


=== Inside a test function ===
=== A test function ===


The inside of a test function tyically looks like this:
The a test function typically looks like


<code php>
<code php>
function test_get_default_question_category() {
function test_move_question_up() {
     // Set things up in preparation for the test.
     // Setup fixture


     // Call the function you want to test.
     // Exercise SUT
    $newlayout = quiz_move_question_up('1,2,0', 2);
 
    // Validate outcome
    $this->assertEqual($newlayout, '2,1,0');
 
    // Teardown fixture


    // Check that the result is what you expected.
}
}
</code>
</code>


For example:
This is the [http://xunitpatterns.com/Four%20Phase%20Test.html four phase test pattern]. Those comments use a lot of testing jargon. The fixture is is the background situation that needs to be set up before the test runs. SUT is short for 'situation under test'. This is where you call the function or method that you want to test. Then you check to see if the function did the right thing. Finally, you have to clean up the fixture you created. With luck there is nothing to do here


=== Test data ===
In this simple example, there is no setup or teardown to do. We just call the function we are testing with some sample input, and check that the return value is what we expect.


TODO
=== Shared setUp and tearDown methods ===


=== setUp and tearDown methods ===
If all your test cases relate to the same area of code, then they may all need to same bit of fixture set up. For example, all the tests in lib/simpletest/teststringmanager.php need an instance of the string_manager class to test.


If all your test cases relate to the same area of code, and so need the same set of test data, then you can create a method called <code>setUp()</code> that sets up the test data. If present, this method will be called before each test method. You can write a matching <code>tearDown()</code> method if there is any clean-up that needs to be done after each test case has run.
To avoid duplicating code, you can override a method called <code>setUp()</code> that sets up the test data. If present, this method will be called before each test method. You can write a matching <code>tearDown()</code> method if there is any clean-up that needs to be done after each test case has run. For example, in lib/simpletest/teststringmanager.php there are setUp and tearDown methods that do something like:
<code php>
public function setUp() {
    // ...
    $this->stringmanager = new string_manager(...);
}


If you have some test test cases the need one sort of setup, and some other test cases that need a different setup, consider splitting your tests into two separate classes, each with its own <code>setUp()</code> method.
public function tearDown() {
    $this->stringmanager = null;
}
</code>
Then, each test can use $this->stringmanager without having to worry about the details of how it is set up.


=== Further information ===
=== Further information ===


The ''SimpleTest'' documentation is at: http://simpletest.sourceforge.net/.
The ''SimpleTest'' documentation is at: http://www.simpletest.org/.


== Changes to your existing code to make it work with unit testing ==
== Changes to your existing code to make it work with unit testing ==


When code is being tested, it gets included from inside one of the simpletest library function. If the code is expecting to be run directly (for example, if it is a view.php or index.php function), you are likely to get errors because that expectation is no longer true.
The whole point of unit testing is to test each piece of functionality separately. You can only do this is only possible to isolate that function and call it individually, perhaps after setting up a few other things.
 
Therefore, it is good if you can write your code to depend on as few other things as possible.  


=== Include paths ===
=== Include paths ===
Line 150: Line 137:


== Unit testing in 2.0 ==
== Unit testing in 2.0 ==
{{Moodle 2.0}}
{{Moodle 2.0}}
With the Objectification of the Database libraries in Moodle 2.0, new and better approaches to Unit testing can be used. Here is a sample of a simple test case: (in course/simpletest)
With the Objectification of the Database libraries in Moodle 2.0, new and better approaches to Unit testing can be used. Here is a sample of a simple test case: (in course/simpletest)
Line 164: Line 152:
     function setUp() {
     function setUp() {
         global $DB;
         global $DB;
         $this->realDB = clone($DB);
         $this->realDB = $DB;
         $DB          = new mockDB();
         $DB          = new mockDB();
     }
     }
Line 191: Line 179:
  }
  }
</code>
</code>
See also UnitTestCaseUsingDatabase in lib/simpletestlib.php.


== Further reading about unit testing ==
== Further reading about unit testing ==


The best book I know about unit testing is [http://www.pragprog.com/titles/utj/pragmatic-unit-testing-in-java-with-junit Pragmatic Unit Testing in Java with JUnit] by Andrew Hunt (no relation) and David Thomas. I know, this book is not called ''Pragmatic Unit Testing in PHP with SimpleTest''. However, it is an excellent book - short, to the point, and very practical. Most of what it says is not specific to Java and JUnit and it is obvious how to apply it in our testing setup.
[http://manning.com/reiersol/ PHP in action] has an excellent chapter explaining unit testing in PHP with simpletest. (Although the rest of that book advocates a style of programming that is very different from the style used in Moodle.)
 


For PHP specific information, [http://www.manning.com/reiersol/ PHP in Action] by Dagfinn Reiersøl (together with Marcus Baker and Chris Shiflett) provides extensive examples of using '''SimpleTest''' for developing object oriented PHP applications, test driven development, and refactoring.
[http://www.pragprog.com/titles/utj/pragmatic-unit-testing-in-java-with-junit Pragmatic Unit Testing in Java with JUnit] is also a very good introduction, despite being in the wrong programming language. JUnit and Simpletest are very similar.


[http://xunitpatterns.com/ xUnit Test Patterns] is the ultimate unit test book. I think it teaches you everything you could learn about unit testing by reading a book. The only way to learn more would be years of experience. It has really great advice for dealing with the kind of messy problems you get in a big, real project like Moodle.


[[Category:Unit tests]]
{{CategoryDeveloper}}
[[Category:Report]]
[[Category:Quality Assurance]]
[[Category:Quality Assurance]]

Revision as of 06:06, 16 April 2009

Moodle1.7 Location: Administration > Reports > Unit tests


The purpose of Unit Tests is to evaluate the individual parts of a program (functions, and methods of classes) to make sure that each element individually does the right thing. Unit Tests can be one of the first steps in a quality control process for developing or tweaking Moodle code. The next steps will involve other forms of testing to ensure that these different parts work together properly.

The unit testing framework is based on the SimpleTest framework.

Running the unit tests in Moodle

Running the basic tests

  1. Log in with an admin account.
  2. Administration ► Development ► Unit tests (moodle >= 2.0, Administration ► Reports ► Unit tests Moodle <= 1.9)
  3. Click on the Reports link near the bottom of the page.
  4. Click the Run tests button and wait.

This finds all the tests in Moodle and runs them. You can run a subset of the tests by entering a path (for example question/type) in the 'Only run tests in' box. Similarly, if a test fails, you get some links in the failure message to make it easy to re-run just those tests.

Writing new tests

As an example, suppose we wanted to write some tests for the string_manager class in mod/quiz/editlib.php.

Where to put the tests

The unit test report finds tests by looking for folders called 'test....php' inside folders called 'simpletest'.

So, for our example, we want to create called something like mod/quiz/simpletest/testeditlib.php. The skeleton of this file should look like:

<?php /**

* Unit tests for (some of) mod/quiz/editlib.php.
*
* @license http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html GNU Public License
* @package question
*/

if (!defined('MOODLE_INTERNAL')) {

   die('Direct access to this script is forbidden.'); //  It must be included from a Moodle page

}

// Make sure the code being tested is accessible. require_once($CFG->dirroot . '/mod/quiz/editlib.php'); // Include the code to test

/** This class contains the test cases for the functions in editlib.php. */ class quiz_editlib_test extends UnitTestCase {

   function test_something() {
       // Do the test here.
   }
   // ... more test methods.

} ?>

That is, you have a class called something_test, and in that class you have lots of methods called test_something. Normally, you have one test method for each particular thing you want to test, and you should try to name the function to describe what is being tested - without making the name too ridiculously long!

A test function

The a test function typically looks like

function test_move_question_up() {

   // Setup fixture
   // Exercise SUT
   $newlayout = quiz_move_question_up('1,2,0', 2);
   // Validate outcome
   $this->assertEqual($newlayout, '2,1,0');
   // Teardown fixture

}

This is the four phase test pattern. Those comments use a lot of testing jargon. The fixture is is the background situation that needs to be set up before the test runs. SUT is short for 'situation under test'. This is where you call the function or method that you want to test. Then you check to see if the function did the right thing. Finally, you have to clean up the fixture you created. With luck there is nothing to do here

In this simple example, there is no setup or teardown to do. We just call the function we are testing with some sample input, and check that the return value is what we expect.

Shared setUp and tearDown methods

If all your test cases relate to the same area of code, then they may all need to same bit of fixture set up. For example, all the tests in lib/simpletest/teststringmanager.php need an instance of the string_manager class to test.

To avoid duplicating code, you can override a method called setUp() that sets up the test data. If present, this method will be called before each test method. You can write a matching tearDown() method if there is any clean-up that needs to be done after each test case has run. For example, in lib/simpletest/teststringmanager.php there are setUp and tearDown methods that do something like: public function setUp() {

   // ...
   $this->stringmanager = new string_manager(...);

}

public function tearDown() {

   $this->stringmanager = null;

} Then, each test can use $this->stringmanager without having to worry about the details of how it is set up.

Further information

The SimpleTest documentation is at: http://www.simpletest.org/.

Changes to your existing code to make it work with unit testing

The whole point of unit testing is to test each piece of functionality separately. You can only do this is only possible to isolate that function and call it individually, perhaps after setting up a few other things.

Therefore, it is good if you can write your code to depend on as few other things as possible.

Include paths

Includes like

require_once('../../config.php'); // Won't work.

won't work. Instead, the more robust option is

require_once(dirname(__FILE__) . '/../../config.php'); // Do this.

Access to global variables

Because your code was included from within a function, you can't access global variables until you have done a global statement.

require_once(dirname(__FILE__) . '/../../config.php'); require_once($CFG->libdir . '/moodlelib.php'); // Won't work.

require_once(dirname(__FILE__) . '/../../config.php');

global $CFG; // You need this. require_once($CFG->libdir . '/moodlelib.php'); // Will work now.

Unit testing in 2.0

Moodle 2.0


With the Objectification of the Database libraries in Moodle 2.0, new and better approaches to Unit testing can be used. Here is a sample of a simple test case: (in course/simpletest)

require_once($CFG->dirroot . '/course/lib.php');

global $DB;
Mock::generate(get_class($DB), 'mockDB');

class courselib_test extends UnitTestCase {
    var $realDB;

    function setUp() {
        global $DB;
        $this->realDB = $DB;
        $DB           = new mockDB();
    }

    function tearDown() {
        global $DB;
        $DB = $this->realDB;
    }

    function testMoveSection() {
        global $DB;
        $course = new stdClass();
        $course->id = 1;

        $sections = array();
        for ($i = 1; $i < 11; $i++) {
            $sections[$i]          = new stdClass();
            $sections[$i]->id      = $i;
            $sections[$i]->section = $i - 1;
        }

        $DB->expectOnce('get_records', array('course_sections', array('course' => $course->id)));
        $DB->setReturnValue('get_records', $sections);
        $this->assertFalse(move_section($course, 2, 3));
    }
}

See also UnitTestCaseUsingDatabase in lib/simpletestlib.php.

Further reading about unit testing

PHP in action has an excellent chapter explaining unit testing in PHP with simpletest. (Although the rest of that book advocates a style of programming that is very different from the style used in Moodle.)

Pragmatic Unit Testing in Java with JUnit is also a very good introduction, despite being in the wrong programming language. JUnit and Simpletest are very similar.

xUnit Test Patterns is the ultimate unit test book. I think it teaches you everything you could learn about unit testing by reading a book. The only way to learn more would be years of experience. It has really great advice for dealing with the kind of messy problems you get in a big, real project like Moodle.

Template:CategoryDeveloper