Talk:HQ component teams: Difference between revisions
From MoodleDocs
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::: Just out of interest, where are non-HQ component leads acknowledged now?--[[User:Tim Hunt|Tim Hunt]] ([[User talk:Tim Hunt|talk]]) 18:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC) | ::: Just out of interest, where are non-HQ component leads acknowledged now?--[[User:Tim Hunt|Tim Hunt]] ([[User talk:Tim Hunt|talk]]) 18:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
:::: Hi, as commented initially, my suggestion here happened because of an edition to fix and reword the "Components" paragraph in the [[Process#Component leads]] page. There, there is a link to the components and their leads in the Tracker (now working, was wrong before). I assumed that public tracker page would be enough, and the primary source of information. If that's not enough I don't have anything to object adding them also here (and renaming this back), in the docs. As said, I just imagined it was the best, updated, source. --[[User:Eloy Lafuente (stronk7)|Eloy Lafuente (stronk7)]] ([[User talk:Eloy Lafuente (stronk7)|talk]]) 18:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:31, 16 January 2018
When I was editing the Process page to point to correct "component leads" page in the tracker I also added a link to this page. Maybe worth renaming it (this page) to "HQ Component Leads" so, it's clear that it's only HQ ones?
For your consideration, ciao :-)
-- Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) (talk) 13:14, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks Eloy for your suggestion. I have renamed the page accordingly. --Helen Foster (talk) 16:20, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Yay, great. Thanks! --Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) (talk) 16:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, as commented initially, my suggestion here happened because of an edition to fix and reword the "Components" paragraph in the Process#Component leads page. There, there is a link to the components and their leads in the Tracker (now working, was wrong before). I assumed that public tracker page would be enough, and the primary source of information. If that's not enough I don't have anything to object adding them also here (and renaming this back), in the docs. As said, I just imagined it was the best, updated, source. --Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) (talk) 18:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
