New permissions evaluation in 2.0: Difference between revisions
From MoodleDocs
(Fixing links to dev pages) |
(→Goals) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
=Goals= | =Goals= | ||
The main goals are: | The main goals are to: | ||
# replace current confusing permission evaluation | # replace current confusing permission evaluation | ||
# improve performance | # improve performance |
Revision as of 20:47, 27 January 2013
New permissions evaluation | |
---|---|
Project state | Implemented |
Tracker issue | MDL-21710 |
Discussion | n/a |
Assignee | Petr Škoda (škoďák) |
Moodle 2.0
Goals
The main goals are to:
- replace current confusing permission evaluation
- improve performance
- enable improvements in permission overriding UI
Permission evaluation algorithm
- find all roles with given capability used in definition or override
- evaluate permissions in given context for each role separately (going from bottom to top in context tree, first found wins unless there is a CAP_PROHIBIT on any level)
- user has capability if he/she has at least one role which evaluated to CAP_ALLOW and at the same time no role which was evaluated to CAP_PROHIBIT
http://tracker.moodle.org/secure/attachment/19672/Allowed_roles.png
Performance improvements
has_capability() and get_users_by_capability() uses fixed number of queries. The result could be returned as sql query instead of database records.
Backwards compatibility
The only potential problem is CAP_PREVENT in overrides when user has several conflicting roles. Originally this was highlighted as a special feature, unfortunately it was in fact the major source of confusion.