Talk:Course formats: Difference between revisions
From MoodleDocs
(Created page with "== Problems with course formats in 2.3 == A brain dump of problems I can think of for coruse format authors: --~~~~ * No place for settings for my format. * Can not take over com...") |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Problems with course formats in 2.3 == | == Problems with course formats in 2.3 == | ||
A brain dump of problems I can think of for | A brain dump of problems I can think of for course format authors: --[[User:Dan Poltawski|Dan Poltawski]] 11:51, 14 August 2012 (WST) | ||
# No place for settings for my format. | |||
# Can not take over complete control of page (get_mods, print_section etc) | |||
# What is a 'section'? Current formats too constrained to a div with a list of li's | |||
# What is the url for 'a section'? | |||
:: I don't see the problem with 1. I am not familiar with the code, and I don't know how it works, but the OU studyplanner course format has its own settings. 3. is not so simple. Constraints for course formats == consistency for users both teachers and students. There is a balance to be struck here. At the low level, the HTML should, of course, be generated by a renderer.--[[User:Tim Hunt|Tim Hunt]] 15:57, 14 August 2012 (WST) | |||
::: Maybe 1. should be 'no consistent place for settings'. Sam has provided me with a copy of the studyplan format and its really a great example of just how much power there is in the current course formats. --[[User:Dan Poltawski|Dan Poltawski]] 14:24, 16 August 2012 (WST) |
Latest revision as of 06:25, 16 August 2012
Problems with course formats in 2.3
A brain dump of problems I can think of for course format authors: --Dan Poltawski 11:51, 14 August 2012 (WST)
- No place for settings for my format.
- Can not take over complete control of page (get_mods, print_section etc)
- What is a 'section'? Current formats too constrained to a div with a list of li's
- What is the url for 'a section'?
- I don't see the problem with 1. I am not familiar with the code, and I don't know how it works, but the OU studyplanner course format has its own settings. 3. is not so simple. Constraints for course formats == consistency for users both teachers and students. There is a balance to be struck here. At the low level, the HTML should, of course, be generated by a renderer.--Tim Hunt 15:57, 14 August 2012 (WST)
- Maybe 1. should be 'no consistent place for settings'. Sam has provided me with a copy of the studyplan format and its really a great example of just how much power there is in the current course formats. --Dan Poltawski 14:24, 16 August 2012 (WST)
- I don't see the problem with 1. I am not familiar with the code, and I don't know how it works, but the OU studyplanner course format has its own settings. 3. is not so simple. Constraints for course formats == consistency for users both teachers and students. There is a balance to be struck here. At the low level, the HTML should, of course, be generated by a renderer.--Tim Hunt 15:57, 14 August 2012 (WST)