Attention : vous consultez actuellement la documentation dédiée aux versions 1.x de Moodle. La documentation pour les versions 2.x de Moodle est consultable ici : mod/techproject/view/missingfeatures, celle pour les versions 3.x de Moodle est consultable ici : mod/techproject/view/missingfeatures et celle pour Moodle 4.x est consultable là : mod/techproject/view/missingfeatures.

« mod/techproject/view/missingfeatures » : différence entre les versions

De MoodleDocs
Aller à :navigation, rechercher
Aucun résumé des modifications
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
[[mod/techproject/view|Index]]
[[mod/techproject/view|Index]]


== What Is Missing ? ==
== Qu'est ce qui manque ? ==


We have plenty of projects about this module. Till now the first edition framework was a first "milestone" for us. The actual version DOES NOT perform the following list of features we would like it will soon provide :  
We have plenty of projects about this module. Till now the first edition framework was a first "milestone" for us. The actual version DOES NOT perform the following list of features we would like it will soon provide :  

Version du 27 mai 2007 à 18:43

Index

Qu'est ce qui manque ?

We have plenty of projects about this module. Till now the first edition framework was a first "milestone" for us. The actual version DOES NOT perform the following list of features we would like it will soon provide :

  • Graphs : visual representation of Gantt and Perth.
  • Input controls : some forms still are weak in data format checking.
  • Association resolution : some bindings may affect how consistent some other entries in the selection list are. We would like that binding lists dynamically filters out irrelevant entries when some entries are selected.
  • Date consistency controls : Some date consistency controls have been implemented, but surely not all that are suitable to avoid scheduling confusion.
  • Late checking on milestones : We would like to have better control on when student are entering stuff within the techproject manager. We started qualifying tasks and milestones with explicit dates. We will surely date other entities, so that "late" imputs can be monitored, and recalls or alarms could be raised.
  • Who does what ? : We would like to enhance student's responsibility feeling about who is inputing what. The next release should nominatively assign all records to an owner when created, so that we could monitor work balance at the end of the project period.