Development:Quiz UI redesign scenarios - Grading et Feedback: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Back to [[Development:Quiz_UI_redesign]] | Back to [[Development:Quiz_UI_redesign]] | ||
==Grading & Feedback== | |||
Most scenarios missing so far. | Most scenarios missing so far. |
Revision as of 19:22, 7 June 2008
Back to Development:Quiz_UI_redesign
Grading & Feedback
Most scenarios missing so far.
During or even after grading, a teacher may get (and need to store in the application) metadata about the exam or about questions
- as feedback from students (or even from other teachers or staff),
- or as a result of analysis, for example: “This question was not answered probably by most students, check wording?”.
Jill
Jill has been given the task to grade the answers to an exam according to an answer template. That is, with each question, she has clearly defined criteria, according to which to grade the answer. Due to this, this answer template - question metadata - that comes with the question, is critical for doing the grading, since Jill is not a professional in the subject field herself.