Note: You are currently viewing documentation for Moodle 3.3. Up-to-date documentation for the latest stable version of Moodle is probably available here: James Neill/Moodleposium/2009/Evans.

User:James Neill/Moodleposium/2009/Evans: Difference between revisions

From MoodleDocs
mNo edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
* Peter Evans is self-employed; [http://www.usq.edu.au/users/evansp/ his professional website]
* Peter Evans is self-employed; [http://www.usq.edu.au/users/evansp/ his professional website]
* Discussed difficulties/challenges about who, how, etc. will do this? Quite a different landscape - Aussie reality - compared to the OU model/scenario discussed by Kirkpatrick.
* Discussed difficulties/challenges about who, how, etc. will do this? Quite a different landscape - Aussie reality - compared to the OU model/scenario discussed by Kirkpatrick.
* Perhaps the key aspect of Peter's talk is the gnarly reality of trying to get a new kind of edtech learning model going in a typical Australian university - lots of questions/problems - some approaches/realities about UQ's approach - good questions - not so many demonstrated solutions - quite a few slides/text - a bit difficult to follow the underlying structure of the presentation


[[Category:User:James Neill/Moodleposium/2009]]
[[Category:User:James Neill/Moodleposium/2009]]

Revision as of 01:40, 7 September 2009

Moodleposium/2009

Moodle at University of Queensland

  • Peter Evans discussed develops in building virtual social communities and portfolios at UQ (indicated that would talk about Moodle, Wimba, and Mahara, but so far no much about these tools)
  • Peter Evans is self-employed; his professional website
  • Discussed difficulties/challenges about who, how, etc. will do this? Quite a different landscape - Aussie reality - compared to the OU model/scenario discussed by Kirkpatrick.
  • Perhaps the key aspect of Peter's talk is the gnarly reality of trying to get a new kind of edtech learning model going in a typical Australian university - lots of questions/problems - some approaches/realities about UQ's approach - good questions - not so many demonstrated solutions - quite a few slides/text - a bit difficult to follow the underlying structure of the presentation