Development talk:Mahara Portfolio Plugin: Difference between revisions
Nigel McNie (talk | contribs) (New page: === Question 1 === It occurs to me that maybe Mahara could send back information about where files could be put/blogposts could be stored etc, as part of the reply to the "intent to send"...) |
Penny Leach (talk | contribs) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Question 1 === | === Question 1 === | ||
It occurs to me that maybe Mahara could send back information about where files could be put/blogposts could be stored etc, as part of the reply to the "intent to send" request? In the "happy path", we wouldn't expect this information to change, so maybe it's safe to send back something then? | It occurs to me that maybe Mahara could send back information about where files could be put/blogposts could be stored etc, as part of the reply to the "intent to send" request? In the "happy path", we wouldn't expect this information to change, so maybe it's safe to send back something then? [[User:Nigel McNie|Nigel McNie]] 07:40, 20 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
We'd have to send back information about where to put any possible content though, because at the intent to send stage, we don't know what format it is (eg, it might just be a file but could be a LEAP/PIOP component, which would go into a whole another artefact plugin). we'd essentially have to send back the entire artefact tree. and then even if we did that, at that point Moodle still doesn't know what format the user wants, so we'd still have to add another step._ | |||
[[User:Penny_Leach|Penny Leach]] | |||
=== Proposed MNET Changes === | |||
moved Nigel's comments to [[Development_talk:MNET Roadmap]] - Penny | |||
Latest revision as of 16:50, 22 July 2008
Question 1
It occurs to me that maybe Mahara could send back information about where files could be put/blogposts could be stored etc, as part of the reply to the "intent to send" request? In the "happy path", we wouldn't expect this information to change, so maybe it's safe to send back something then? Nigel McNie 07:40, 20 July 2008 (CDT)
We'd have to send back information about where to put any possible content though, because at the intent to send stage, we don't know what format it is (eg, it might just be a file but could be a LEAP/PIOP component, which would go into a whole another artefact plugin). we'd essentially have to send back the entire artefact tree. and then even if we did that, at that point Moodle still doesn't know what format the user wants, so we'd still have to add another step._
Penny Leach
Proposed MNET Changes
moved Nigel's comments to Development_talk:MNET Roadmap - Penny
