Aquesta pàgina forma part de la documentació de Moodle en català, tot i que no ha estat traduïda encara. Podeu contribuir obertament a les tasques de traducció. Podeu consultar la Guia d'edició de la documentació i també participar ens els debats del fòrum de traductors de la documentació a moodle.org

MoodleDocs:Protected page: diferència entre les revisions

De MoodleDocs
Salta a:navegació, cerca
(move Moodledocs category to higher category)
(Protected pages should, in general, be clearly indicated as such and categorised using Template:Pp-protection, with a reason provided for the protection, because this is more informative for users)
 
Línia 1: Línia 1:
Pages may be protected from general editing because they contain very important information. Only [[MoodleDocs:Administrators|administrators]] are able to edit protected pages. If you have a suggestion for a change, please use the corresponding talk page.
# Pages may be protected from general editing because administrators consider that they contain very important information. Only [[MoodleDocs:Administrators|administrators]] are able to edit fully protected pages. If you have a suggestion for a change, please use the corresponding talk page.
# Protected pages should, in general, be clearly indicated as such and categorised using [[Template:Pp-protection]], with a reason provided for the protection, because this is more informative for users and more in the spirit of [[constructivism]], however this is a new suggestion by [[User:James Neill|James Neill]] which is yet to be discussed or implemented.


==See also==
==See also==

Revisió de 15:37, 9 set 2008

  1. Pages may be protected from general editing because administrators consider that they contain very important information. Only administrators are able to edit fully protected pages. If you have a suggestion for a change, please use the corresponding talk page.
  2. Protected pages should, in general, be clearly indicated as such and categorised using Template:Pp-protection, with a reason provided for the protection, because this is more informative for users and more in the spirit of constructivism, however this is a new suggestion by James Neill which is yet to be discussed or implemented.

See also