MoodleDocs:Protected page: diferència entre les revisions
De MoodleDocs
(Protected pages should, in general, be clearly indicated as such and categorised using Template:Pp-protection, with a reason provided for the protection, because this is more informative for users) |
|||
(Hi ha 2 revisions intermèdies del mateix usuari que no es mostren) | |||
Línia 1: | Línia 1: | ||
Pages may be protected from general editing because they contain very important information. Only [[MoodleDocs:Administrators|administrators]] are able to edit protected pages. If you have a suggestion for a change, please use the corresponding talk page. | # Pages may be protected from general editing because administrators consider that they contain very important information. Only [[MoodleDocs:Administrators|administrators]] are able to edit fully protected pages. If you have a suggestion for a change, please use the corresponding talk page. | ||
# Protected pages should, in general, be clearly indicated as such and categorised using [[Template:Pp-protection]], with a reason provided for the protection, because this is more informative for users and more in the spirit of [[constructivism]], however this is a new suggestion by [[User:James Neill|James Neill]] which is yet to be discussed or implemented. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Línia 5: | Línia 6: | ||
*[[:Category:Protected pages]] | *[[:Category:Protected pages]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Page protection]] | ||
[[es:MoodleDocs:Páginas protegidas]] | [[es:MoodleDocs:Páginas protegidas]] |
Revisió de 15:37, 9 set 2008
- Pages may be protected from general editing because administrators consider that they contain very important information. Only administrators are able to edit fully protected pages. If you have a suggestion for a change, please use the corresponding talk page.
- Protected pages should, in general, be clearly indicated as such and categorised using Template:Pp-protection, with a reason provided for the protection, because this is more informative for users and more in the spirit of constructivism, however this is a new suggestion by James Neill which is yet to be discussed or implemented.