Broken/Javascript-interface for repeat elements function - Historial de revisió

Gorelov.serj a 18:14, 14 oct 2010

2010-10-14T18:14:47Z

← Versió més antiga		Revisió del 18:14, 14 oct 2010
Línia 1:		Línia 1:
	1. Consider optionally sending AJAX request to the server to inform it of the adding blanks if it will be found really necessary. --[[User:Oleg Sychev\|Oleg Sychev]] 21:43, 13 October 2010 (UTC)		1. Consider optionally sending AJAX request to the server to inform it of the adding blanks if it will be found really necessary. --[[User:Oleg Sychev\|Oleg Sychev]] 21:43, 13 October 2010 (UTC)



	1. Which situations require this?		1. Which situations require this?
	2. What should we do with AJAX reply? Ignore?		2. What should we do with AJAX reply? Ignore? --[[User:Сергей Горелов\|Сергей Горелов]] 18:14, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Gorelov.serj a 18:14, 14 oct 2010

2010-10-14T18:14:04Z

← Versió més antiga		Revisió del 18:14, 14 oct 2010
Línia 1:		Línia 1:
	1. Consider optionally sending AJAX request to the server to inform it of the adding blanks if it will be found really necessary. --[[User:Oleg Sychev\|Oleg Sychev]] 21:43, 13 October 2010 (UTC)		1. Consider optionally sending AJAX request to the server to inform it of the adding blanks if it will be found really necessary. --[[User:Oleg Sychev\|Oleg Sychev]] 21:43, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

			1. Which situations require this?
			2. What should we do with AJAX reply? Ignore?

Oasychev a 21:43, 13 oct 2010

2010-10-13T21:43:15Z

← Versió més antiga		Revisió del 21:43, 13 oct 2010
Línia 1:		Línia 1:
	~~# "Where it will be" - don't think full list is necessary, you may just list some places~~. ~~Core function should work anywhere it called, calling isn't you problems.~~		1. Consider optionally sending AJAX request to the server to inform it of the adding blanks if it will be found really necessary. --[[User:Oleg Sychev\|Oleg Sychev]] 21:43, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
	~~# I don't think using~~ AJAX to add new blanks is a good idea. Why don't just add them using javascript on the page, creating new HTML-elements (you'll need a hidden empty blank somewhere ready to copying) and changing hidden element with the ~~number of blanks? The~~ server ~~is stateless,~~ it ~~won't find anything strange when the modified form will be submitted.~~
	~~# Last sentences about deleting/moving isn't necessary, you are talking with the smart people, they sure know what those icon do. At least make pictures smaller - or just delete all this.~~
	~~# Still nothing about preserving original numbers~~ of the blanks ~~and proposed changes in the repeat_elements interface to set $prefix instead of two existing (and one new) element names...~~
	~~# I don't see any "restore order" button on the screenshots, I also don't sure why~~ it ~~is necessary while it definitely wouldn't be easy thing to implement. If you implement all other things that~~ will be ~~quite enought~~.
	--[[User:Oleg Sychev\|Oleg Sychev]] 21:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Oasychev a 21:27, 2 oct 2010

2010-10-02T21:27:16Z

← Versió més antiga		Revisió del 21:27, 2 oct 2010
Línia 1:		Línia 1:
	~~I already told you what I~~ think ~~about this page:~~		# "Where it will be" - don't think full list is necessary, you may just list some places. Core function should work anywhere it called, calling isn't you problems.
	~~# one screenshot~~ is ~~quite enought for what~~ you ~~done~~, it isn't ~~necessary~~ to add ~~screenshot to every alert message box - this~~ is ~~not Microsoft User Manual~~, ~~just~~ a ~~sentence that this will be done~~ is ~~enought;~~		# I don't think using AJAX to add new blanks is a good idea. Why don't just add them using javascript on the page, creating new HTML-elements (you'll need a hidden empty blank somewhere ready to copying) and changing hidden element with the number of blanks? The server is stateless, it won't find anything strange when the modified form will be submitted.
	~~# one more screenshot needed to show how~~ it ~~would look~~ when ~~blank contains exactly one string, without any fieldsets around it~~		# Last sentences about deleting/moving isn't necessary, you are talking with the smart people, they sure know what those icon do. At least make pictures smaller - or just delete all this.
	# ~~write out thoroughtly~~, ~~which field types~~ you ~~would check for been non~~-~~empty when deleting~~		# Still nothing about preserving original numbers of the blanks and proposed changes in the repeat_elements interface to set $prefix instead of two existing (and one new) element names...
	# ~~write how you would remember initial positions~~ of the blanks and ~~return them after editing~~		# I don't see any "restore order" button on the screenshots, I also don't sure why it is necessary while it definitely wouldn't be easy thing to implement. If you implement all other things that will be quite enought.
	# ~~and mind you spelling, correct~~ "~~choise~~" ~~all over~~ the ~~place.~~		--[[User:Oleg Sychev\|Oleg Sychev]] 21:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
	~~Now~~ I ~~am wondering~~ why it ~~still not done.~~..
	--[[User:Oleg Sychev\|Oleg Sychev]] 13:21, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Oasychev: New page: I already told you what I think about this page: # one screenshot is quite enought for what you done, it isn't necessary to add screenshot to every alert message box - this is not Microsof...

2010-10-01T13:21:35Z

New page: I already told you what I think about this page: # one screenshot is quite enought for what you done, it isn't necessary to add screenshot to every alert message box - this is not Microsof...

Pàgina nova

I already told you what I think about this page:
# one screenshot is quite enought for what you done, it isn't necessary to add screenshot to every alert message box - this is not Microsoft User Manual, just a sentence that this will be done is enought;
# one more screenshot needed to show how it would look when blank contains exactly one string, without any fieldsets around it
# write out thoroughtly, which field types you would check for been non-empty when deleting
# write how you would remember initial positions of the blanks and return them after editing
# and mind you spelling, correct "choise" all over the place.
Now I am wondering why it still not done...
--[[User:Oleg Sychev|Oleg Sychev]] 13:21, 1 October 2010 (UTC)