Talk:Arguments in favour of PostgreSQL: Difference between revisions
From MoodleDocs
(Clarifying questions) |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Richard Who? | Richard Who? | ||
--[[User:Richard Enison|Richard Enison]] 01:33, 26 November 2007 (CST) | --[[User:Richard Enison|Richard Enison]] 01:33, 26 November 2007 (CST) | ||
The link at the top of the article takes you to a forum thread where it becomes clear. Of course, it would be could if you had time to edit the article a bit to make it clear for people without having to refer to the thread. | |||
== innodb vs myisam == | |||
Could you discuss innodb vs. myisam? Both of these are mySQL. are the limitations you are talking about only related to myisam, or do they also consider innodb which seems to try to address limitations in mySQL. | |||
--[[User:Gary Anderson|Gary Anderson]] 02:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
:INNODB sucks a lot less than MyISAM, but it is still not as good as Postgres if you ask one of us Postgres biggots ;-)--[[User:Tim Hunt|Tim Hunt]] 07:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:23, 7 April 2009
Michael Who? Richard Who? --Richard Enison 01:33, 26 November 2007 (CST)
The link at the top of the article takes you to a forum thread where it becomes clear. Of course, it would be could if you had time to edit the article a bit to make it clear for people without having to refer to the thread.
innodb vs myisam
Could you discuss innodb vs. myisam? Both of these are mySQL. are the limitations you are talking about only related to myisam, or do they also consider innodb which seems to try to address limitations in mySQL. --Gary Anderson 02:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- INNODB sucks a lot less than MyISAM, but it is still not as good as Postgres if you ask one of us Postgres biggots ;-)--Tim Hunt 07:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
