Talk:Performance recommendations: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 14:56, 19 October 2011

Performance - G, Apr 11, very good, re-use, related and useful is Performance_FAQ

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-there's still the suggestion of using turck mmcache. the last release is from 11/2003! is that recommendation valid? are there better alternatives? what about eaccelerator?
+Performance - G, Apr 11, very good, re-use,
+related and useful is Performance_FAQ
-eAccelerator does seem by consensus to be the way to go, but though there's a working beta there appear to be issues with its stability and performance, especially with PHP5 (e.g. breaks the -GRACEFUL command in apachectl). It's flagged as unstable in most repositories - the message on the forums appears to be wait around a little! Rory Allford
-Changes have now been made to update this section. Please check if anything is missing or needs amending. [[User:Ken Wilson|Ken Wilson]] 10:59, 4 January 2007 (CST)