Note: You are currently viewing documentation for Moodle 2.0. Up-to-date documentation for the latest stable version is available here: James Neill/Moodleposium/2010/Dearn.

User:James Neill/Moodleposium/2010/Dearn: Difference between revisions

From MoodleDocs
([http://aliyasteed.wordpress.com/2010/10/07/web-2-0-finding-a-voice-in-academic-learning/ Finding a voice in academic learning])
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
John Dearn argued for an undergraduate teaching model that emphasised 3-year progressive development of scholarly skills and knowledge.
John Dearn argued for an undergraduate teaching model that emphasised 3-year progressive development of scholarly skills and knowledge.


Personally. I felt that John was overly attached to a monolithic, grand vision - I think society and tertiary education is moving more towards flexible, multi-pathway, cross-institutional etc. education.
Personally, I liked the positioning of scholarship as the main goal for tertiary education - but I did think this was kind of obvious. There was a lot of comment about poor quality tertiary education not living up to this basic mission or raison d'etre of universities. However, I felt that John was overly promoting  a vain hope for a monolithic, grand vision - I think society and tertiary education is moving more towards flexible, multi-pathway, modularised, cross-institutional, distributed etc. education.


[http://aliyasteed.wordpress.com/2010/10/07/web-2-0-finding-a-voice-in-academic-learning/ Finding a voice in academic learning]
[http://aliyasteed.wordpress.com/2010/10/07/web-2-0-finding-a-voice-in-academic-learning/ Finding a voice in academic learning]


[[Category:User:James Neill/Moodleposium/2010]]
[[Category:User:James Neill/Moodleposium/2010]]

Revision as of 04:02, 7 October 2010

John Dearn argued for an undergraduate teaching model that emphasised 3-year progressive development of scholarly skills and knowledge.

Personally, I liked the positioning of scholarship as the main goal for tertiary education - but I did think this was kind of obvious. There was a lot of comment about poor quality tertiary education not living up to this basic mission or raison d'etre of universities. However, I felt that John was overly promoting a vain hope for a monolithic, grand vision - I think society and tertiary education is moving more towards flexible, multi-pathway, modularised, cross-institutional, distributed etc. education.

Finding a voice in academic learning