Talk:Embedded Answers (Cloze) question type: Difference between revisions
From MoodleDocs
Frank Ralf (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
: I posted [https://docs.moodle.org/de/L%C3%BCckentext-Fragen#Beispiel:_.22Wieso.3F_Weshalb.3F_Warum.3F.22_-_L.C3.BCckentext_mit_Kurzantwort another example with more than one correct answer in the German Moodle Docs]. --[[User:Frank Ralf|Frank Ralf]] 11:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC) | : I posted [https://docs.moodle.org/de/L%C3%BCckentext-Fragen#Beispiel:_.22Wieso.3F_Weshalb.3F_Warum.3F.22_-_L.C3.BCckentext_mit_Kurzantwort another example with more than one correct answer in the German Moodle Docs]. --[[User:Frank Ralf|Frank Ralf]] 11:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Embedded questions and cloze tests are not the same == | |||
In fact, cloze tests are the opposite of embedded questions. The answer in a cloze test is conspicously missing, not embedded in the text. |
Revision as of 22:12, 18 February 2010
The example doesn't work.
The question about Paris does not parse! --Howard Miller 05:50, 17 September 2008 (CDT)
- I entered the example in HTML mode and made sure to remove all line breaks. The question did parse but the half wrong answer "Marseille" was regarded as 100% wrong and didn't show the provided feedback. --Frank Ralf 16:38, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
- There was a slight mistake in the syntax. The equal sign (=) doesn't seem to work, so I put "%100%" in instead. The following code will work:
The capital of France is {1:SHORTANSWER:%100%Paris#Congratulations! ~%50%Marseille#No, that is the second largest city in France (after Paris).~*#Wrong answer. The capital of France is Paris, of course.}.
- Amended the docs accordingly. --Frank Ralf 13:23, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- I posted another example with more than one correct answer in the German Moodle Docs. --Frank Ralf 11:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Embedded questions and cloze tests are not the same
In fact, cloze tests are the opposite of embedded questions. The answer in a cloze test is conspicously missing, not embedded in the text.