Talk:SPDC Portfolio: Difference between revisions
From MoodleDocs
Helen Foster (talk | contribs) (→Prep for Moodle 2.0: reply) |
(→Prep for Moodle 2.0: I am confuzed :) my initial question, what do we call "it".) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::Hi Tim, I am just going to do it. I needed the info your provided to make an articulable decision. --[[User:chris collman|chris collman]] 17:40, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | :::Hi Tim, I am just going to do it. I needed the info your provided to make an articulable decision. --[[User:chris collman|chris collman]] 17:40, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::Hi Chris, thanks for your efforts with this. However, I'm in agreement with Tim that the changes should be reverted since portfolios in Moodle 2.0 ''will not be a module''. Regarding renaming the contributed portfolio module documentation page, I suggest the same name as in the modules and plugins database - [http://moodle.org/mod/data/view.php?d=13&rid=686 SPDC Portfolio]. --[[User:Helen Foster|Helen Foster]] 19:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | ::::Hi Chris, thanks for your efforts with this. However, I'm in agreement with Tim that the changes should be reverted since portfolios in Moodle 2.0 ''will not be a module''. Regarding renaming the contributed portfolio module documentation page, I suggest the same name as in the modules and plugins database - [http://moodle.org/mod/data/view.php?d=13&rid=686 SPDC Portfolio]. --[[User:Helen Foster|Helen Foster]] 19:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:: Ah, and of course I read things in reverse order, here last :) But what are we calling the [[Advance Feature]] (broken link) which I sort of understand is not a module but an "integration into Moodle". May I suggest "Rose"? LOL. Eventually we will have to tell people how to use the Rose thingy. Sorry to create such a tempest in a teapot--[[User:chris collman|chris collman]] 21:40, 27 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:40, 27 January 2010
Prep for Moodle 2.0
Portfolio will be part of Standard package in 2.0. I do not know how it relates to previous versions and what needs to happen to transition from Portfolio 1.9 to 2.0 . I noticed under Advanced features (a new 2.0 feature?) that "Portfolio" was a broken link, so came here. I broke the version out into subheadings but the big picture people may have a better idea. --Chris collman 15:42, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Chris, the third-party Portfolio module, and the Portfolio integration in Moodle 2.0 core are completely separate things. I think you should revert your changes to this page.--Tim Hunt 16:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for comment. I think a new page rather than a revert is in order. Any suggestion for naming the contributed module Portfolio page? "Portfolio module" should be the starting page name for 2.0 Portfolio version. Maybe a Portfolio Disambiguation page for a year or so, and add a Portfolio 1.9 for the contributed module page. "Old Portfolio module" as a page name is not very respectful :) --Chris collman 17:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Tim, I am just going to do it. I needed the info your provided to make an articulable decision. --Chris collman 17:40, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Chris, thanks for your efforts with this. However, I'm in agreement with Tim that the changes should be reverted since portfolios in Moodle 2.0 will not be a module. Regarding renaming the contributed portfolio module documentation page, I suggest the same name as in the modules and plugins database - SPDC Portfolio. --Helen Foster 19:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Tim, I am just going to do it. I needed the info your provided to make an articulable decision. --Chris collman 17:40, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, and of course I read things in reverse order, here last :) But what are we calling the Advance Feature (broken link) which I sort of understand is not a module but an "integration into Moodle". May I suggest "Rose"? LOL. Eventually we will have to tell people how to use the Rose thingy. Sorry to create such a tempest in a teapot--Chris collman 21:40, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for comment. I think a new page rather than a revert is in order. Any suggestion for naming the contributed module Portfolio page? "Portfolio module" should be the starting page name for 2.0 Portfolio version. Maybe a Portfolio Disambiguation page for a year or so, and add a Portfolio 1.9 for the contributed module page. "Old Portfolio module" as a page name is not very respectful :) --Chris collman 17:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)