Note: You are currently viewing documentation for Moodle 1.9. Up-to-date documentation for the latest stable version is available here: Teacher documentation.

Talk:Teacher documentation: Difference between revisions

From MoodleDocs
(page styling)
(Conflict: Activity modules vs Blocks, (Developer page vs User page))
Line 4: Line 4:


:Hi Divb, I agree with you that the page doesn't look quite right. I hope our theme developer [[User:UrsHunkler|Urs]] will be able to help. --[[User:Helen|Helen]] 23:44, 31 January 2006 (WST)
:Hi Divb, I agree with you that the page doesn't look quite right. I hope our theme developer [[User:UrsHunkler|Urs]] will be able to help. --[[User:Helen|Helen]] 23:44, 31 January 2006 (WST)
== Conflict: Activity modules vs Blocks, (Developer page vs User page) ==
[[Activity modules]] page is developer page, but similar [[Blocks]] page is user page. I think must be both page for both target auditory - modules for developers, modules for user, blocks for developers and blocks for user. What we will do?--[[User:Nashev|Nashev]] 06:20, 9 February 2006 (WST)

Revision as of 22:20, 8 February 2006

Page styling

I know it makes more sense stylistically, but i'm not sure it makes sense to provide a list like this horizontally as opposed to vertically. Even though it is alphabetical, it doesn't seem right. --D.I. von Briesen 17:13, 30 January 2006 (WST)

Hi Divb, I agree with you that the page doesn't look quite right. I hope our theme developer Urs Hunkler will be able to help. --Helen Foster 23:44, 31 January 2006 (WST)

Conflict: Activity modules vs Blocks, (Developer page vs User page)

Activity modules page is developer page, but similar Blocks page is user page. I think must be both page for both target auditory - modules for developers, modules for user, blocks for developers and blocks for user. What we will do?--Nenashev Ilya 06:20, 9 February 2006 (WST)