Talk:Site administration menu 2.0: Difference between revisions
From MoodleDocs
(Helen, nomenclature, page naming question for new 2.0 pages) |
m (→Questions) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Questions== | ==Questions== | ||
Back to the what to call a Rose, when there is no page. Should links on this page link to (currently non existing) pages called "XYZ settings", or "Manage XYZ" ? We a bunch to add and or bring over from development:, so having a consistent nomenclature would be a noble goal. --[[User:chris collman|chris collman]] 14:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC) | Back to the what to call a Rose, when there is no page. Should links on this page link to (currently non existing) pages called "XYZ settings", or "Manage XYZ" ? We have a bunch to add and or bring over from development:, so having a consistent nomenclature would be a noble goal. --[[User:chris collman|chris collman]] 14:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:28, 8 May 2010
I am not sure about this page name. However, I think it should be organized like the Site administration block page We will probably have to keep that page for a few years for legacy Moodles. I put the picture on this page as a reference. I will create sections for each item shown. Then we can add short links under these to the relevant pages in MoodleDocs. --Chris collman 14:41, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Questions
Back to the what to call a Rose, when there is no page. Should links on this page link to (currently non existing) pages called "XYZ settings", or "Manage XYZ" ? We have a bunch to add and or bring over from development:, so having a consistent nomenclature would be a noble goal. --Chris collman 14:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
