Talk:ForumNG: Difference between revisions
From MoodleDocs
(New page: I'm not at all sure if anyone will ever read this. I've set up this page because #On trying to see where core Moodle forum bug fixes and enhancements were at for 2.0 I found 'nowhere', ...) |
Helen Foster (talk | contribs) m (Talk:forum/forumng moved to Talk:ForumNG) |
Latest revision as of 08:46, 9 August 2010
I'm not at all sure if anyone will ever read this.
I've set up this page because
- On trying to see where core Moodle forum bug fixes and enhancements were at for 2.0 I found 'nowhere', they were not on the agenda.
- In this search I discovered ForumNG. (I did ask why not fix the core forums . . .) I tried NG, and the module has some good things going for it that I could really use
- In getting this sorted I could not find quickly the core information I needed, so I've centralised it all here
- It's no immediatley obvious what some of the benefits of NG are, and the romantic view is that this may help get people into a place where they appreciate it and use it. Plugin help is often very very patchy.
What will happen in the future? Who knows. Personally I hope as a minimum NG gets a few critical aspects added and then NG is added as a contributed module to the core Moodle install like the book module. Derek Chirnside 00:26, 9 August 2010 (UTC)