Note: You are currently viewing documentation for Moodle 1.9. Up-to-date documentation for the latest stable version is available here: File system repository configuration.

Talk:File system repository configuration: Difference between revisions

From MoodleDocs
(Flesh out the template a bit more.)
(need to read more, dinner and a walk makes a difference :))
Line 19: Line 19:
:Chris, thanks as always for your contributions. However, I'm not following your chain of thought here. Please note that [[File system repository configuration]] provides instructions for administrators needing to configure a file system repository. As far as I know, the instructions are complete! Also, I don't think we need a separate [[Manage repositories]] page in addition to [[Repositories]]. Let's try and keep things as simple as possible on one page! --[[User:Helen Foster|Helen Foster]] 21:48, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
:Chris, thanks as always for your contributions. However, I'm not following your chain of thought here. Please note that [[File system repository configuration]] provides instructions for administrators needing to configure a file system repository. As far as I know, the instructions are complete! Also, I don't think we need a separate [[Manage repositories]] page in addition to [[Repositories]]. Let's try and keep things as simple as possible on one page! --[[User:Helen Foster|Helen Foster]] 21:48, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


::I know you like it simple but I am too thick headed to see simple straight away :) My thinking was the site admin will get to plugins>respositories.  Then they are going to see "Manage repositories" and a list of all the repositories that happen to be active.  So by my logic, this page should be called "Manage repositories" since that is the the language of the schema.  Alternatively, in a very round about way I was thinking if we wanted to keep with the language of on the teachers side of the interface, what administrators were doing was "add/edit repositories" (where as the usual activity button for this says something different). That expands a bit on my logic.   
::I know you like it simple but I am too thick headed to see simple straight away :) My thinking was the site admin will get to plugins>respositories.  Then they are going to see "Manage repositories" and a list of all the repositories that happen to be active.  So by my logic, this page should be called "Manage repositories" since that is the the language of the schema.  That expands a bit on my logic which after dinner and a walk in the snow with K-9 does not seem logoical based on the content of this page. I thought Repository was the new name for the file system.  
What ever you think is best will always work for me.  We can change it later:) --[[User:chris collman|chris collman]] 22:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
::I need to sleep on it after reading all the pages on this subjectThanks for you comments --[[User:chris collman|chris collman]] 22:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:18, 8 December 2010

Humm, good ideas and instructions here. Need to figure out what goes where and page naming for this new feature.

This is probably a good overall page, we probably can use a Template:Repositories that includes

  • [[Repositories|Repository overview]] the template heading
  • [[Manage repositories]] This is the equal to an activity's Add/edit page as Helen points out, probably content of this page
  • Common repository settings - I am ignornat at the moment, are the settings for Utube the same as Google Docs (which I tried). Are we going to have seperate pages for those 15 plus Server, Private, and new?

Could be end of template here or go on with:

    • Server files(I think these things pop up on the site admin Plugin> Repository list if turned on.
    • Recent files
    • Upload a file
    • Private files
    • Other Standard repositories
    • Create a repository

This page and the template is for a site administrator but it will impact File picker.

Chris's roundtuit list, or someone else can jump in :) --Chris collman 12:49, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Chris, thanks as always for your contributions. However, I'm not following your chain of thought here. Please note that File system repository configuration provides instructions for administrators needing to configure a file system repository. As far as I know, the instructions are complete! Also, I don't think we need a separate Manage repositories page in addition to Repositories. Let's try and keep things as simple as possible on one page! --Helen Foster 21:48, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
I know you like it simple but I am too thick headed to see simple straight away :) My thinking was the site admin will get to plugins>respositories. Then they are going to see "Manage repositories" and a list of all the repositories that happen to be active. So by my logic, this page should be called "Manage repositories" since that is the the language of the schema. That expands a bit on my logic which after dinner and a walk in the snow with K-9 does not seem logoical based on the content of this page. I thought Repository was the new name for the file system.
I need to sleep on it after reading all the pages on this subject. Thanks for you comments --Chris collman 22:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)