Note: You are currently viewing documentation for Moodle 1.9. Up-to-date documentation for the latest stable version is available here: Language packs and Moodle Docs.

MoodleDocs talk:Language packs and Moodle Docs: Difference between revisions

From MoodleDocs
No edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
# If release is retained in the lang packs does it need duplicating in MoodleDocs?
* If release is retained in the lang packs does it need duplicating in MoodleDocs?
I would say no. I am not a fan of duplicating stuff, since one of both will be outdated. Put it in MoodleDocs on a protected page and let the installer show it. It isn't translated (recently) in many languages. And even if translated, it was not often in the release. I've never seen translated release notes during installation.
I would say no. I am not a fan of duplicating stuff, since one of both will be outdated. Put it in MoodleDocs on a protected page and let the installer show it. It isn't translated (recently) in many languages. And even if translated, it was not often in the release. I've never seen translated release notes during installation.


# Perhaps install could be retained too, with a link to Installing Moodle for further information?
* Perhaps install could be retained too, with a link to Installing Moodle for further information?
Not necessary - provide a good link in the installer and in a readme file in the root.
Not necessary - provide a good link in the installer and in a readme file in the root.


# Should licence be retained in the lang packs or be a protected wiki page?
* Should licence be retained in the lang packs or be a protected wiki page?
I think licence shouldn't be translated at all because of the legal nature of that page.
I think licence shouldn't be translated at all because of the legal nature of that page.


# Re. other, perhaps this could redirect to the Moodle help files?
* Re. other, perhaps this could redirect to the Moodle help files?
??
??


# Re. teacher, should this redirect to an updated teacher manual wiki page or to Teacher documentation?  
* Re. teacher, should this redirect to an updated teacher manual wiki page or to Teacher documentation?  
Yes! A short introduction page on the teacher documentation
Yes! A short introduction page on the teacher documentation
I filed two bugs on this matter, one for Moodle code Bug #4800 and one for language packs Bug #4759
--[[User:koen roggemans|koen roggemans]] 01:11, 20 February 2006 (WST)
--[[User:koen roggemans|koen roggemans]] 01:11, 20 February 2006 (WST)

Revision as of 17:40, 19 February 2006

  • If release is retained in the lang packs does it need duplicating in MoodleDocs?

I would say no. I am not a fan of duplicating stuff, since one of both will be outdated. Put it in MoodleDocs on a protected page and let the installer show it. It isn't translated (recently) in many languages. And even if translated, it was not often in the release. I've never seen translated release notes during installation.

  • Perhaps install could be retained too, with a link to Installing Moodle for further information?

Not necessary - provide a good link in the installer and in a readme file in the root.

  • Should licence be retained in the lang packs or be a protected wiki page?

I think licence shouldn't be translated at all because of the legal nature of that page.

  • Re. other, perhaps this could redirect to the Moodle help files?

??

  • Re. teacher, should this redirect to an updated teacher manual wiki page or to Teacher documentation?

Yes! A short introduction page on the teacher documentation

I filed two bugs on this matter, one for Moodle code Bug #4800 and one for language packs Bug #4759

--Koen roggemans 01:11, 20 February 2006 (WST)