Note: You are currently viewing documentation for Moodle 1.9. Up-to-date documentation for the latest stable version is available here: Documents useful for decision makers.

Documents useful for decision makers

From MoodleDocs
Revision as of 23:39, 13 December 2007 by Joao Fernandes (talk | contribs) (links)
  1. (2003) Commonwealth of Learning: COL LMS Open Source
  2. (2004) Jamil Itmazi & Miguel Meg: Survey: Comparison and evaluation studies of learning content management systems
  3. (2004) Dublin City University: Moodle at DCU
  4. (2004) CMS@EC: Survey of students opinions of Moodle
  5. (2004) Catalyst IT Limited: Technical Evaluation of selected Learning Management Systems
  6. (2004) Jay Melton: The CMS moodle: A Heuristic Evaluation
  7. (2005) Dave Bremer & Reuben Bryant: A Comparison of Two Learning management Systems: Moodle vs Blackboard
  8. (2005) Safine Graf & Beate List: An Evaluation of Open Source E-Learning Platforms Stressing Adaptation Issues
  9. (2005) Bert Bos, Kathy Munoz & Joan Van Duzer: Blackboard vs. Moodle A Comparison of Satisfaction with Online Teaching and Learning Tools
  10. (2006) Jon Dron: Any color you like, as long as it’s Blackboard (r)
  11. (2006) Idaho State University: LMS Focus Group Report
  12. [http://www.isu.edu/itrc/resources/LMS_Pilot_Report_FINAL_Fall06.pdf (2006) Idaho State University: LMS Pilot Report (Moodle)}
  13. (2006) Jay Melton: The LMS moodle: A Usability Evaluation
  14. (2006) Brendan Moloney & Tomothy Gutierrez: An Enquiry into Moodle Usage and Knowledge in a Japanese ESP program
  15. (2006) Michael Winter: Learning Management Systems for the Workplace A Research Report
  16. (2007) Andreas Wittke: Why German Universities choose Moodle instead of Sakai
  17. (2007) Idaho State University: LMS Final Report
  18. (2007) Michael Machado & Eric Tao: Blackboard vs. Moodle: Comparing User Experience of Learning Management Systems
  19. (2007) Humboldt State University: Learning Management System Evaluation Report
  20. (2007) Google Trends