Note: You are currently viewing documentation for Moodle 1.9. Up-to-date documentation for the latest stable version is available here: Developer meeting January 2009.

Developer meeting January 2009: Difference between revisions

From MoodleDocs
(→‎Moodle 2.0: project management overview)
Line 18: Line 18:
* [[Development:Community hub|Community hub interfaces]]
* [[Development:Community hub|Community hub interfaces]]
: Martin explained that community hub interface had no code yet at all, just the start of a spec, breaking down ideas into pieces. Feedback would be good!
: Martin explained that community hub interface had no code yet at all, just the start of a spec, breaking down ideas into pieces. Feedback would be good!
* [[Conditional activities]]
:Martin described Sam's conditional activities as looking beautiful and working beautifully! More testing would be good and maybe an overview settings page.
* [[Development:Progress tracking]]
: Martin explained that a GSOC student had written a spec but as yet there is no code.
* [[Development:Course completion]]
: Martin explained that course completion is necessary for progress tracking.
* [[Development:Wiki 2.0]]
: Martin talked about Petr going to Spain for a week to talk with Ludo and the guys. Lots of wiki functionality should be part of core libraries, existing text formats should be improved, comments should be like comments elsewhere. The best bits of ouwiki and nwiki will be pulled out and put in new framework.
* [[Development:Changing_the_Moodle_Question_Engine|Changing the Moodle Question Engine]]
* [[Development:Changing_the_Moodle_Question_Engine|Changing the Moodle Question Engine]]
:Tim outlined his thoughts on changing the Moodle question engine.
:Tim outlined his thoughts on changing the Moodle question engine.

Revision as of 14:27, 29 January 2009

Developer meetings > January 2009 meeting


The meeting was at 13:00 UTC on Tuesday, 27 January 2009. We had 28 participants and we covered everything in around two hours 45 minutes.


Meeting notes finished soon!

Moodle 2.0

Martin D gave a project management overview of Moodle 2.0, covering current project status and goals for the next few months. Moodle 2.0 is not going to be a time-driven release, but rather a quality release, taking as long as it takes. Martin explained that he was trying to get a handle on timing and trying to get more people in to help finish. The Moodle 2.0 Planning document is for the Moodle community to view our progress. All projects have links to documentation and/or and tracker meta issues for full details.
  • Database API
Petr explained that we're looking for funding to implement native oracle and mssql support.
  • File API
Martin said that repository file browsing is now working well, every forum post etc has file area. The resource module needs rethink e.g. text page versus web page needs to be redone, also form elements need to be finished. It's now trivial to add multiple files e.g. to forum post with a new file manager element allowing lots of files. The repository file browser now knows about mime types.
Martin explained that community hub interface had no code yet at all, just the start of a spec, breaking down ideas into pieces. Feedback would be good!
Martin described Sam's conditional activities as looking beautiful and working beautifully! More testing would be good and maybe an overview settings page.
Martin explained that a GSOC student had written a spec but as yet there is no code.
Martin explained that course completion is necessary for progress tracking.
Martin talked about Petr going to Spain for a week to talk with Ludo and the guys. Lots of wiki functionality should be part of core libraries, existing text formats should be improved, comments should be like comments elsewhere. The best bits of ouwiki and nwiki will be pulled out and put in new framework.
Tim outlined his thoughts on changing the Moodle question engine.
Helen outlined the gradebook improvements planned and thanked everyone for their input (tracker issues and voting, gradebook forum posts, testing). Nicolas demonstrated the new "Edit categories and items" page with simple and full views. He explained that grade item attached to category can now be edited on the same page as the grade category. Nicolas also demonstrated the horizontal scroll bar in the LSU simple grader report and the animated grade statistics report.
Jerome Mouneyrac talked about the overall structure of web services.

Other news

Sam Marshall described his forum rewrite for the Open University which will be implemented in 1.9 as a separate module It includes various AJAX features - reply on the same page, forum rating, new forum view. Input is welcome, though it's already scheduled to be developed.
Helen talked about Leslie Hawthorn's confirmation that GSOC and Google Highly Open Participation (GHOP) will both run this year. GHOP will begin in November. Regarding GSOC, assuming Moodle is accepted, students will be able to apply at the end of March. Thus we need to check the list of suggestions from our GSOC mentor debriefing last year and start coming up with student project ideas soon!
Jeff Forssell asked for comments about his 'feedback link for all elements' proposal. Suggestions included a feedback link in the page footer or using a portfolio plugin.

See also