Note: You are currently viewing documentation for Moodle 1.9. Up-to-date documentation for the latest stable version is available here: Tracker.

Talk:Tracker: Difference between revisions

From MoodleDocs
mNo edit summary
(Reasons for intro edit)
Line 3: Line 3:


Answer: If you do not have sufficient rights to 'reopen' a bug, simply add a comment to it.  The assignee & creator will receive email notification of your comments, and they can reopen the bug.
Answer: If you do not have sufficient rights to 'reopen' a bug, simply add a comment to it.  The assignee & creator will receive email notification of your comments, and they can reopen the bug.
:Noticed Moodle.org homepage link says "Issue Tracking" which is a change from Bug Tracker or what ever it was between then and now.  Recent Buzz in social forum about where to log "good ideas" made this change jump out at me.  Issue is a little bit more encompasing, warm and friendly term than the old reliable [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:H96566k.jpg bug]. Notice the Tracker page had not reflected this "new image" so revamped the introduction.  My edit job is still does not flow the way I want it, but I think it is an improvement. --[[User:chris collman|chris collman]] 06:44, 3 October 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 11:44, 3 October 2006

What do we do to re-open an item that has been marked as resolved, but really is not? : see http://tracker.moodle.org/browse/MDL-6762. Would you just resubmit it? D.I. von Briesen 00:35, 3 October 2006 (CDT)

Answer: If you do not have sufficient rights to 'reopen' a bug, simply add a comment to it. The assignee & creator will receive email notification of your comments, and they can reopen the bug.

Noticed Moodle.org homepage link says "Issue Tracking" which is a change from Bug Tracker or what ever it was between then and now. Recent Buzz in social forum about where to log "good ideas" made this change jump out at me. Issue is a little bit more encompasing, warm and friendly term than the old reliable bug. Notice the Tracker page had not reflected this "new image" so revamped the introduction. My edit job is still does not flow the way I want it, but I think it is an improvement. --Chris collman 06:44, 3 October 2006 (CDT)