Talk:Moodle in education: Difference between revisions
From MoodleDocs
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I know that I made the link to https://docs.moodle.org/en/Book incorrectly. I will figure out how I should have done this and come back.--[[User:Art Lader|Art Lader]] 10:09, 19 February 2006 (WST) | I know that I made the link to https://docs.moodle.org/en/Book incorrectly. I will figure out how I should have done this and come back.--[[User:Art Lader|Art Lader]] 10:09, 19 February 2006 (WST) | ||
:Gosh, that was easy --[[User:Art Lader|Art Lader]] 10:36, 19 February 2006 (WST) | |||
Revision as of 02:36, 19 February 2006
Page styling
I know it makes more sense stylistically, but i'm not sure it makes sense to provide a list like this horizontally as opposed to vertically. Even though it is alphabetical, it doesn't seem right. --D.I. von Briesen 17:13, 30 January 2006 (WST)
- Hi Divb, I agree with you that the page doesn't look quite right. I hope our theme developer Urs Hunkler will be able to help. --Helen Foster 23:44, 31 January 2006 (WST)
Conflict: Activity modules vs Blocks, (Developer page vs User page)
Activity modules page is developer page, but similar Blocks page is user page. I think must be both page for both target auditory - modules for developers, modules for user, blocks for developers and blocks for user. What we will do?--Nenashev Ilya 06:20, 9 February 2006 (WST)
- Hi Nashev, thanks for highlighting this issue. How about we use the Wikipedia solution - disambiguation pages e.g. Blocks and Modules. --Helen Foster 05:30, 14 February 2006 (WST)
Incorrect Link
I know that I made the link to https://docs.moodle.org/en/Book incorrectly. I will figure out how I should have done this and come back.--Art Lader 10:09, 19 February 2006 (WST)
- Gosh, that was easy --Art Lader 10:36, 19 February 2006 (WST)
